PLEASE SHARE WITH YOUR FRIENDS
The
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, on Thursday asked
Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court to strike out a
fundamental rights suit brought by Andrew Yakubu, former Group Managing
Director, GMD, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, against
the Commission for lack of jurisdiction. Operatives of the EFCC had on February 3 stormed a building belonging
to the former NNPC boss and recovered a staggering sum of $9,772,000
(Nine Million, Seven Hundred and Seventy Two Thousand United States
Dollars) and £74,000 (Seventy Four Thousand Pound Sterling) stashed in a
huge fire proof safe following which he reported to the Commission’s
Kano Zonal Office on February 8, 2017 and admitted being the owner of
both the house and the money recovered.In a dramatic turn, Mr. Yakubu, in a suit filed through his counsel,
Ahmed Raji, is challenging his detention since February 8 and demanding
the enforcement of his right to dignity of person, personal liberty,
fair hearing, freedom of movement, private and family life and to
acquire own property.Aside praying the court to shield him from further investigation by
the EFCC, he is also demanding N1 billion as cost against EFCC and
Attorney-General of the Federation, AGF, who is the second respondent,
for the violation of his aforementioned rights.Mr. Raji, while adopting his written address, urged the court to
grant all the reliefs sought by the applicant (Mr. Yakubu). He stated
that “the sum total of the relief sought by the respondent is the
release of the Applicant/Respondent as the investigation is still going
on”.Though, Mr. Raji admitted that the EFCC can investigate anybody, he,
however, said such should not be an excuse for unwarranted detention
especially in a situation where at the end of trial the person may not
go to jail.Mr. Raji also told the court that he was not aware of Exhibit EFCC 4
(order from Magistrate Court in Kano), adding that the
Applicant/Respondent has not been brought to the court or any court of
law.He submitted that “the exhibit is irregular and constitute a gross abuse of the proceedings of this court”.In his preliminary objection, Johnson Ojogbane, counsel to EFCC, told the court that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the suit.He argued that “all the facts relevant to the Applicant/Respondent’s
application took place in Kano State which is outside the jurisdiction
of the Federal High Court Abuja”.“It is not in doubt that, the acts leading to this action filed by
the Applicant/Respondent all occurred in Kano. He was never invited to
the commission’s head office in Abuja and never came to Abuja in respect
of the instant case. In view of this, the Federal High Court lacks
territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter as the court
must have both subject matter and territorial jurisdiction to entertain a
case,” Mr. Ojogbane argued.On the Applicant’s prayer for human rights enforcement, Mr. Ojogbane
argued that “the application is incompetent, incurably defective and
therefore robs this honourable court of the jurisdiction to determine
the suit.”He went on to add that the detention warrant that authorised the
detention of the applicant/respondent was obtained in Kano State as the
EFCC is investigating the allegations levelled against the former NNPC
boss.On the other hand, the AGF, represented by T. A. Gazali brought an
application asking the court for more time to regularise its processes
that was filed out of time.Justice Mohammed has adjourned to March 14 for further hearing.
No comments:
Post a Comment